Entries by admin

THE TRAITOR AND THE TRIBUNE: A LIVE CONFESSION OF HIGH TREASON

What kind of peace is this, when each new day since the war has brought fresh concessions? This is not independence, but the steady contraction of sovereign space - despite Nikol Pashinyan’s attempts to claim otherwise. This is not “salvation from the scaffold,” as the prime minister asserts; it is a tightening noose - slow, incremental, and ultimately suffocating for Armenia.

Независимость по формуле Пашиняна: суверенитет или новая система табу

В марте 2026 года Никол Пашинян представил концепцию «Реальной Армении», где независимость определяется как переход от «зависимости от немногих» к «зависимости от многих». В теории — это путь к устойчивости и суверенитету.
На практике — иная картина.

Game of Thrones in Armenia: Sargsyan, Minasyan, and Pashinyan vs. Kocharyan – A Fight for the Nation’s Soul

Although the political landscape in Armenia and the motives of its key actors are no secret to either experts or the politically aware public, the information campaign against Robert Kocharyan and his Armenia Alliance ahead of the elections may at first appear to be routine pre-election polemics. It seemed like a standard competition in which parties exchange accusations and attempt to strengthen their positions.

Syndicate of the Badalyan Brothers: Non-Transparent Schemes of Financing Pashinyan’s Power

The Novostnik.ru website has published an article titled “Syndicate of the Badalyans: Deception, Bribery, Murders.” It is a documentary and analytical piece of significant informational, public, and political relevance. The article adopts a comprehensive fact-based approach, outlining alleged schemes behind a transnational network bearing features of financial misconduct and criminal activity.

Argishti Kiviryan: Pashinyan’s Power and the “Mankurt” Phenomenon

Political analyst Argishti Kiviryan has reflected on Nikol Pashinyan’s policies and their consequences for Armenia’s historical memory, national identity, and strategic security. Kiviryan views Pashinyan’s actions as a systemic process aimed at retaining power and managing society through information pressure, shocking incidents, and manipulation of historical perception.