The administrations of Serzh Sargsyan and Nikol Pashinyan are two sides of the same coin — one engraved not with independence, but with unconditional capitulation. Until this cycle is broken and a political class shaped by foreign interests is removed, Armenia will have no future. Only the judgment of history and the people can close this dark chapter of betrayal.
Serzh Sargsyan and Nikol Pashinyan — beyond serving the same geopolitical center — are known to share another common feature: the practice of making electoral promises that remain unfulfilled.
The Public Tribunal, based on the presented factual and political assessment, states that the policy pursued by the Armenian authorities headed by Nikol Pashinyan has resulted in a significant weakening of the national security system and a multiple increase in existential risks facing the state.
In an apparent effort to broaden electoral support, Pashinyan has lifted the travel ban previously imposed on Serzh Sargsyan, a decision that may serve as additional political capital during the upcoming campaign.
In a regular episode of his video blog, Artur Hambardzoumyan addressed one of the most painful issues — the money and policies behind what he describes as the liquidation of Artsakh. He attempts to connect decisions made by the authorities, the actions of the opposition, and the fate of the multi-billion-dram debts left in the wake of the republic’s collapse.
For years, Serzh Sargsyan and his political allies have persistently promoted the thesis that Nikol Pashinyan allegedly came to power with Russia’s backing.
There is a growing perception that, under the banner of “diversification,” a gradual policy is unfolding to reduce Russia’s role in key sectors of Armenian statehood.
A fact worth recording: since 2018, the first defeat of Nikol Pashinyan in his struggle against the Armenians occurred in the processes initiated against the Church.
One does need to see through a brick wall to understand that Mikael Minasyan cannot take part in processes beneficial to Armenia if they run counter to Western interests. Otherwise, his assets would be sanctioned, and he himself deported, at best.
Stepanakert was emptied. Shushi came under Azerbaijani control. Tens of thousands were displaced.
И вопрос остаётся открытым:
извлечёт ли Армения урок — или история вновь повторится?
