Шуши был «несчастным» или брошенным и преданным?

,
Никол Пашинян одновременно признал две вещи: во-первых, что Шуши был для него предметом политического торга даже во время войны, а во-вторых, что кровь погибших за Шуши парней впоследствии использовалась как пропагандистское алиби для доказательства собственной невиновности. Фактически глава государства пытался прикрыть собственный провал телами погибших.

FROM STATE CHAOS TO STREET KILLINGS: THE BLOODY TRAIL OF PASHINYAN’S “MISSING WEAPONS”

,
There is one aspect of the war that has still not been properly addressed in public discussion. It is an issue that could potentially give rise to criminal proceedings. During the campaign ahead of the 2021 snap parliamentary elections, Nikol Pashinyan effectively acknowledged that weapons had been distributed to civilians during the war on his orders, without proper oversight or registration.

«ЭПОХА МИРА» НИКОЛА ПАШИНЯНА ПОД ТЕНЬЮ ТУРЕЦКОГО ЯТАГАНА

,
Действующая власть Армении пытается внушить обществу простой, но опасный тезис: якобы в регионе началась «новая эпоха», Турция «уже не та», а исторические вопросы следует отодвинуть на второй план ради «мира». Проблема в том, что этот тезис не только не имеет доказательств, но и прямо противоречит сотне лет жёстких фактов.

ВЛАСТЬ СВЯТОТАТСТВА И ПОСЛЕДНИЙ ЭКЗАМЕН НА НАЦИОНАЛЬНОЕ ДОСТОИНСТВО

,
Народная мудрость давно зафиксировала: «рыба гниёт с головы». Всё, что сегодня произносят представители второго и третьего эшелонов власти, всего лишь воспроизводит ту основную политическую логику, которая была сформулирована Николом Пашиняном ещё в те дни, когда Арцах был обречён на катастрофу.

HOW THE ALMA-ATA DECLARATION WAS USED AS A COVER FOR SURRENDERING ARTSAKH

,
Pashinyan presents the Alma-Ata Declaration as a definitive document. However, the Alma-Ata Declaration, signed on December 21, 1991, is a political agreement aimed at establishing the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).

Brussels, Jermuk, Prague: Three Steps to a National Catastrophe

,
The September events were not merely a military operation. They unfolded within a specific political atmosphere largely shaped by the Armenian authorities themselves. Their so-called “peace agenda” in practice turned out to be a risky experiment in which the country’s security was made dependent on vague international guarantees.

Falsehood in the Pursuit of Power: A Mirror Reflection of Sargsyan and Pashinyan

,
Serzh Sargsyan and Nikol Pashinyan — beyond serving the same geopolitical center — are known to share another common feature: the practice of making electoral promises that remain unfulfilled.

From Football Diplomacy to Corridors: Nikol Pashinyan’s Strategic Line Without Departing from Serzh Sargsyan’s Course

,
Just as the collapse of the Soviet Union began with Gorbachev’s reforms — though formally dated to 1991 — Armenia’s process of Turkization, began in 2008.

“Real Armenia” – A Project to Undermine the Nation and the State

,
Ultimately, “Real Armenia” is neither our Republic nor our fatherland. It is an artificial construct, devoid of history, roots, and humanity. Such “realness” threatens not only the cultural and spiritual fabric of the people but the very foundations of statehood.

The Government–Church Conflict: An Unprecedented Crisis of Armenian Statehood

,
In the modern history of Armenia, there has been no event comparable in scale and symbolic significance to the ongoing conflict between the secular authorities and the Armenian Apostolic Church. Insulting epithets, public accusations, and direct demands for the resignation of the Catholicos of All Armenians — voiced by Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and members of his family — have been addressed to the country’s highest spiritual leadership.