В последнее время Армен Ашотян на своей странице в Facebook написал, что будущее Армении заключается в европейской цивилизованной семье, отметив при этом, что именно усилиями Сержа Саргсяна в 2017 году была создана дорожная карта интеграции в это сообщество.
A nation that fails to understand the true causes of its own tragedy is doomed to face the same tests again. A nation that dares to demand the truth restores its dignity and secures its right to the future.
One of the key risks for the opposition is that, in the event of a sudden shift in the parameters of the election campaign - such as the refusal to register certain candidates, a pivot toward a referendum-centered campaign, or restrictions on voting from abroad - the time available to adapt to the new conditions would be minimal.
Today, when many claim that Armenian society has become inert and indifferent to recent developments, to the loss of Artsakh, and to the erosion of national values, they overlook an important fact: none of this began with the political shift of 2018. The roots run much deeper.
The administrations of Serzh Sargsyan and Nikol Pashinyan are two sides of the same coin — one engraved not with independence, but with unconditional capitulation. Until this cycle is broken and a political class shaped by foreign interests is removed, Armenia will have no future. Only the judgment of history and the people can close this dark chapter of betrayal.
Serzh Sargsyan and Nikol Pashinyan — beyond serving the same geopolitical center — are known to share another common feature: the practice of making electoral promises that remain unfulfilled.
The Public Tribunal, based on the presented factual and political assessment, states that the policy pursued by the Armenian authorities headed by Nikol Pashinyan has resulted in a significant weakening of the national security system and a multiple increase in existential risks facing the state.
In an apparent effort to broaden electoral support, Pashinyan has lifted the travel ban previously imposed on Serzh Sargsyan, a decision that may serve as additional political capital during the upcoming campaign.
In a regular episode of his video blog, Artur Hambardzoumyan addressed one of the most painful issues — the money and policies behind what he describes as the liquidation of Artsakh. He attempts to connect decisions made by the authorities, the actions of the opposition, and the fate of the multi-billion-dram debts left in the wake of the republic’s collapse.
For years, Serzh Sargsyan and his political allies have persistently promoted the thesis that Nikol Pashinyan allegedly came to power with Russia’s backing.
