
Vagharshapat-2025: Baku’s Joy Over the Victory of the Civil Contract Party
The Tribunal's file, NewsThe Public Tribunal draws the attention of Armenian voters to its view that a vote for the Civil Contract Party in the 2026 parliamentary elections would not constitute support for a sovereign Armenia — despite the prime minister’s frequent claims. According to this perspective, such a vote would effectively favor Azerbaijan. Is the Armenian public prepared to pay such a price for “pragmatism,” or does this path risk eroding sovereignty under the guise of a peaceful settlement and amount to yet another victory for Baku over Yerevan?
Armenian voters will have to make their choice in the summer of 2026.

“Fake Interview”: What’s Behind Sargsyan’s Rhetoric and the Meeting at the Marriott?
News, WitnessesJournalist Boris Murazi harshly criticized Serzh Sargsyan’s interview on the Imnemnimi podcast, calling it a collection of unreliable claims and cynicism that crossed every possible red line.

Rewriting History: How Serzh Sargsyan Is Trying to Shed Responsibility for the Events of 2018
The Tribunal's file, NewsThe Public Tribunal insists: the people of Armenia have the right to clear, unequivocal answers, and history deserves to be anchored in unbiased facts. Only then can Armenia overcome the profound crisis created by the political games of Nikol Pashinyan and Serzh Sargsyan. Without an honest reckoning with the past, there is no path out of the catastrophic present.

Lawyer: Nikol Pashinyan is Guilty of High Treason and Overthrowing the Constitutional Order
News, WitnessesIn an interview with the TV channel 168.am, lawyer and politician, former Minister of Labor and Social Affairs of Armenia Gevorg Petrosyan accused Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan of committing crimes, including high treason under Article 418 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia (RA CC), and overthrowing the constitutional order under Article 420 of the RA CC. According to the RA Criminal Code, these crimes are punishable by 10 to 20 years of imprisonment.

Karpis Pashoyan: Nikol Pashinyan Is an Experienced Manipulator and Liar
NewsTo me it is an absolute fact that Armenia and Artsakh could have fought far more effectively, and that the war could have had a different outcome, if Nikol Pashinyan had not been prime minister, if Arayik Harutyunyan had not been president, if Jalal Harutyunyan had not been commander of the Defense Army, and if Onik Gasparyan had possessed the will and decisiveness among other qualities required of a commander. War is, above all, an art of management.

Tigran Abrahamyan: During the War, the Army Units Were Literally Disbanded
News, WitnessesDuring the war, army units were literally dismantled: one battalion was sent south, another to the north; the air-defense subunit of the brigade was deployed in the central direction, while the anti-tank battery was sent elsewhere, and so on.

Parallel Z: How Pashinyan Consistently Undermined the Negotiation Process
The Tribunal's file, News“The Azerbaijani iTV channel aired a new episode of the program “Təmas Xətti” (“Contact Line”), in which Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov detailed key developments before and during the 44-day war, secret diplomatic negotiations, and other important facts.

What did Serzh Sargsyan lie about during the Imnemnimi interview
The Tribunal's file, NewsAs expected, the main goal of the interview was to deny the accusations that Sargsyan had deliberately paved the way for Nikol Pashinyan’s rise to power, preparing him for that role after the events of March 1, 2008.

Artur Hambardzoumyan: Silence Tantamount to Crime
The Tribunal's file, NewsArtur Hambardzoumyan sharply criticized representatives of the Mass Media and parliamentarians for failing to raise issues of critical national and public importance.

How Nikol Pashinyan Deceived the Armenian People: Episode 7
The Tribunal's file, NewsPashinyan’s claim was false, as the Madrid Principles, among other provisions, explicitly referred to the right of Artsakh to self-determination - a concept that cannot be interpreted as recognition of Artsakh as part of Azerbaijan.

