The country went into elections still reeling from the aftermath of war, with thousands of casualties and a security system in disarray. Under normal circumstances, this would have sparked serious discussions on accountability. However, in Armenia in 2021, what unfolded was a political performance where the leading figure was Serzh Sargsyan, despite all his declarations to the contrary.

Kocharyan sharply criticized the moral image of the current authorities. According to him, Nikol Pashinyan came to power under slogans of love for the people, but in practice, it turned out that his true loyalty lies with money.

Вардан Гукасян (ДОГ) в своём видеоблоге выразил сомнение в том, что Никол Пашинян мог самостоятельно, пешим походом из Гюмри в Ереван, осуществить так называемую «бархатную революцию» и захватить власть.

На протяжении последних четырёх месяцев людей, остававшихся в Арцахе, удерживали в колониальных условиях в комплексе «Дгяк». Как сообщает телеграм-канал «Анив», об этом пишет арцахский общественный деятель Тигран Петросян.

The reality is clear and unforgiving: the incumbent authorities do not enjoy the support of the majority of the population. If more than 50 percent of eligible voters participate in the elections, the re-election of Nikol Pashinyan becomes highly unlikely. His continued hold on power rests largely on public despair, fear, and low voter turnout.

Кризис, переживаемый Арменией сегодня, носит прежде всего интеллектуальный и нравственный характер. Единственный подлинный выход — восстановление общества образованного, мыслящего и способного брать на себя ответственность за собственную судьбу. Без этого любые перемены будут неизбежно поверхностными и недолговечными.

When the authorities conceal their own incomes, multiply their expenditures, and lecture pensioners on what is supposedly “better” for them, this is neither an error nor a flaw. It is a deliberate policy — one in which the state budget ceases to be a public resource and instead becomes a closed fund for insiders.

Mina Khachatryan has published 20 questions addressed to Serzh Sargsyan on her Telegram channel, “Mina-Z.”

Both the beginning and the end of Robert Kocharyan’s presidency were marked by tragic events that shaped Armenia’s political environment for years to come. The armed attack on the Armenian Parliament on October 27, 1999, shocked the young republic. Nearly a decade later, on March 1, 2008, a deepened political crisis culminated in bloody clashes on the streets of Yerevan. These events were not merely isolated tragedies; they planted explosive charges beneath public institutions, fueled mutual distrust, and led to a profound societal divide.

At first glance, the film presents itself as a documentary: it lists facts from the businessman’s biography, recalls his ties with major companies, and mentions his involvement in charitable initiatives. However, closer examination reveals not an impartial analysis but a carefully constructed propaganda piece.