Nikol Pashinyan 2016: Aghdam Is Our Homeland

In 2016, amid public protests, Nikol Pashinyan sharply criticized then-President Serzh Sargsyan for his willingness to consider mutual concessions in the negotiations over the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict.

Pashinyan’s Cognitive Dissonance: “It was not my motorcade that hit a pregnant woman; it was the Armenian Prime Minister’s.”

,
On July 16, 2025, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan’s press conference took place at the Sports and Concert Complex after Karen Demirchyan. In particular, in response to the question why those guilty in the death of Sona Mnatsakanyan, who was hit by a vehicle of the prime minister’s motorcade, remain unpunished, Nikol Pashinyan said: “It was not my motorcade that hit the pregnant woman; it was the Armenian Prime Minister’s. What does this have to do with me?”
Католикос Гарегин II, Никол Пашинян

Legal Outrage of Authorities against the Armenian Apostolic Church. The Tribunal Accuses Pashinyan of Overthrowing the Constitutional Order

,
The Tribunal accuses Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan of the following: Overthrow of the constitutional order through the subjugation of the judiciary of the Republic of Armenia, in violation of Article 4 of the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia. Violation of the inviolability of the private life of the citizens of Armenia – a right guaranteed by the Constitution of the RA. Interfering in the internal affairs of the AAC in violation of Article 17 of the Constitution of the RA and the Law of the RA on Relations Between the Republic of Armenia and the Armenian Apostolic Church. Calling for the violent overthrow of the Catholicos of All Armenians, which risks inciting public unrest and clashes.
Серж Саргсян, Артур Амбарцумян, Никол Пашинян

The Velvet Revolution Paradox: Serzh Sargsyan Prospers After Being “Overthrown”

,
In 2018, a non-violent Velvet Revolution took place in the Republic of Armenia. The country’s third president, who was supposedly overthrown, not only remained in Armenia but also retained his influence - and continues to prosper alongside his inner circle.
Микаэл Минасян

Mikael Minasyan: Seven Things Nikol Could Have Done — But Didn’t

,
“The war began because you did everything to sabotage the negotiations and turn the enemy’s dream into reality - to make the world see justification for its war ambitions,” Golos Armenii newspaper quotes Mikael Minasyan, former Ambassador of Armenia to the Vatican, as saying. On November 12, 2020, Minasyan took to his Facebook page to list what Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan could have done to prevent the catastrophe in Artsakh, but chose not to.
Тиран Хачатрян

Tiran Khachatryan: Nikol Pashinyan did for the army what he wanted, not what was needed

,
When Pashinyan says the army was never refused anything it asked for, he should remember how many times the army needed money, they asked for it, but he refused. There were both professional and details substantiations, explanation of the purpose of that money, but they never allocated any
Ишхан Сагателян

What Did Nikol Pashinyan Surrender to Azerbaijan? Ishkhan Saghatelyan Drafts the List

,
In response, Ishkhan Saghatelyan published a detailed post on his account in the banned social media platform, arguing that it is crucial to remind the public — clearly and factually — of all the unilateral, both oral and written, concessions made since November 9, 2020.
Анна Акопян

The Dark Side of the “Velvet” First Lady The Tribunal Accuses Anna Hakobyan of Complicity in Crimes Against the State and the People of Armenia

,
Anna Hakobyan: "Why do we need Karabakh? It should be turned into an autonomy. It’s like a suitcase without a handle - only Russia needs it. Because of Karabakh, we’re in an economic blockade, and all our borders are closed."
Кафедральный собор Эчмиадзин

Pashinyan Targets One of the Foundational Pillars of Armenian History

,
Pashinyan is setting a dangerous precedent - not only by interfering in the internal affairs of the Church, but by attempting to bring it under the control of a secular government in a country where the Church is far more than just a religious institution. The potential consequences of this move could prove far more serious for Armenia than the proposed changes to the Constitution or even the state emblem.