Witnesses

Witnesses in the TRIBUNAL Project cases

Айк Наапетян

Hayk Nahapetyan: From Baku’s Statements to Domestic Blackmail — How Fear Shapes Armenia’s Agenda

,
The Public Tribunal’s key conclusion is explicit: Nikol Pashinyan and his team constitute a threat to Armenia’s national security. The sooner Armenia removes what is described as an anti-national leadership, the sooner it can emerge from the situation created by the “velvet revolutionaries.”
Артур Амбарцумян

Запретные темы армянской политики: о чём не смеют говорить ни власть, ни оппозиция

,
Артур Амбарцумян отмечает, что в политическом поле существуют «запретные темы», о которых не говорят ни власть, ни оппозиция.
Артур Амбарцумян

GAME WITH A PREDETERMINED OUTCOME? A POLITICAL CONFIGURATION AHEAD OF THE ELECTIONS

,
In his video blog, Artur Hambardzumyan argues that Pashinyan has carried out one of the most pragmatic political operations of recent years. He has constructed a configuration of political confrontation around himself that places him in a favorable position, even with relatively low approval ratings.

RPA and Serzh Sargsyan: Hypocrisy Under the Guise of Consolidation

,
The RPA’s motto is simple and cynical: either us or Nikol Pashinyan. Any force capable of genuinely competing with Pashinyan immediately becomes a target for discrediting, manipulation, and political games.

The Truth About War – Marked As Hushed-Up

,
A nation that fails to understand the true causes of its own tragedy is doomed to face the same tests again. A nation that dares to demand the truth restores its dignity and secures its right to the future.
Айк Наапетян

On the Crossroads of War, “Peace,” and Statehood

,
The Public Tribunal, based on the presented factual and political assessment, states that the policy pursued by the Armenian authorities headed by Nikol Pashinyan has resulted in a significant weakening of the national security system and a multiple increase in existential risks facing the state.

The Price of Liquidation: 1.2 Billion U.S. Dollars — The Financial Side of the Artsakh Tragedy

,
In a regular episode of his video blog, Artur Hambardzoumyan addressed one of the most painful issues — the money and policies behind what he describes as the liquidation of Artsakh. He attempts to connect decisions made by the authorities, the actions of the opposition, and the fate of the multi-billion-dram debts left in the wake of the republic’s collapse.

“The Person Who Ceded Artsakh Is Making Allegations Against Us” – Archbishop Bagrat Srbazan’s Speech in Court

,
The Public Tribunal maintains that the trial has long since exceeded the boundaries of legal procedure. Its political subtext is evident and impossible to ignore.